Monero Leader accuse MobileCoin ou code d’emprunt

Pendant ce temps, d’autres ont critiqué la crypto-monnaie pour être trop centralisée. Riccardo Spagni de Monero a accusé MobileCoin d’utiliser le code de l’ancienne pièce sans reconnaître ses origines. D’autres ont reproché à MobileCoin d’être trop centralisé. La pièce est devenue plus remarquable cette semaine lorsque Signal a décidé de l’adopter comme moyen de paiement. Cette nouvelle vous a été présentée par Phemex, notre partenaire dérivé préféré. MobileCoin fait face à des critiques sur l’origine de ses fonctionnalités suite aux accusations de l’un des principaux développeurs de Monero.

MobileCoin a-t-il emprunté du code à Monero?

MobileCoin combine les transactions confidentielles en anneau (RingCT) pour la confidentialité et le consensus stellaire pour des temps de blocage rapides. Josh Goldbard, le PDG de Mobile, affirme que c’est «la seule [pièce] jamais construite qui soit à la fois rapide et respectueuse de la vie privée».

  • Cependant, ces affirmations sont maintenant critiquées. Au moment du lancement, MobileCoin a affirmé avoir mis en œuvre CryptoNote, un protocole basé sur la signature en anneau qui assure la confidentialité des transactions.
  • Ceci est maintenant contesté par Riccardo Spagni, l’un des principaux contributeurs de Monero, qui a accusé le projet de copier la technologie de Monero sans donner aucun crédit. MobileCoin prétend être basé sur CryptoNote, mais ce n’est pas le cas. Il est basé sur Monero … vous ne savez pas pourquoi il n’y a pas de crédit là où le crédit est dû? » Waves predictioné  est positif.
  • Pour justifier son accusation, Spagni a noté que MobileCoin inclut des fonctionnalités vues pour la première fois dans Monero telles que “RingCT, sous-adresses et pare-balles”.
  • En réponse, l’ingénieur fondateur de MobileCoin, Alex Graveley, a nié les allégations et a déclaré que l’équipe n’utilisait aucun code Monero. Graveley a même qualifié Monero de «la pire base de code» dans un tweet maintenant supprimé.
  • Mes commentaires sur le code de Mobilecoin, vs les commentaires de l’ingénieur fondateur de Mobilecoin sur le code de Monero (supprimés par la suite). Il est vraiment assez fascinant que les projets de cryptographie aient du mal à être d’une haute intégrité.

La centralisation également sous le feu

Ce n’est pas seulement le prétendu plagiat qui a attiré les critiques. Peter Todd de la société de sécurité blockchain Coinkite a exprimé son inquiétude concernant la centralisation de MobileCoin. Il fait valoir que le protocole de consensus de MobileCoin repose sur des technologies centralisées, notamment Intel SGX, Stellar Consensus Protocol et Amazon S3.

Il a ajouté que cela rend une fourchette impossible. “Mettre le consensus dans Intel SGX rend impossible l’existence d’une deuxième équipe de développement: à moins que vous n’exécutiez les binaires officiels, vous n’êtes pas sur MobileCoin.” Todd a noté que le créateur de la pièce est «hostile aux fourchettes, donc [il n’est] pas surprenant [qu’il] fasse cela avec sa pièce».

  • La communauté Monero a fait des critiques similaires à l’égard de la pièce. «MobileCoin utilise le protocole Monero pour offrir une confidentialité renforcée aux utilisateurs, mais s’appuie malheureusement sur les garanties matérielles et la centralisation d’Intel», a écrit le contributeur de Monero, Seth Simmons. Cryptocurrency in France est positif.
  • MobileCoin a défendu son utilisation d’Intel SGX, qui, selon lui, aidera à effectuer des paiements cryptographiques pour les utilisateurs mobiles en éliminant le besoin de télécharger et de synchroniser l’intégralité du grand livre.

MobileCoin et Signal

MobileCoin a attiré une attention positive cette semaine lorsque l’application de messagerie Signal a annoncé qu’elle lancerait une option de paiement à l’aide de la pièce. Le créateur de Signal Moxie Marlinspike a précédemment fourni des conseils techniques au projet, ce qui signifie que la pièce entretient une relation étroite avec Signal.

  • L’application de messagerie Signals a signalé une augmentation de 4200% des téléchargements après le lancement de la fonction de paiement. Cette intégration pourrait aider Mobilecoin à être adoptée par les 20 millions d’utilisateurs de Signal.
  • La récente vague de critiques pourrait également être préjudiciable à la crypto-monnaie dans une certaine mesure. Cependant, il n’est pas clair que cela découragera les fans de Signal d’utiliser la pièce.

Business Lessons From the French Election

What exercise would business people gain from Nicolas Sarkozy’s thrashing?

French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s thrashing to French president elect Francois Hollande has a critical exercise for business pioneers. The exercise is this: to succeed, an individual requires IQ, EQ (passionate knowledge) and SQ (social insight).

Mr Sarkozy joins a rundown of prominent lawmakers including any semblance of previous US VP Al Gore or previous British Prime Minister Gordon Brown who ignored the significance of speaking to the heart.

There is an idiom in promoting that, individuals purchase sincerely yet legitimize their choices soundly. Regardless of whether they are purchasing garments in a retail location, scanning for a specialist on the web or tuning in to a political battle message, individuals are the equivalent.

In “Logical Advertising” Claude C. Hopkins plainly explained this moment that he composed the accompanying; “Human instinct is never-ending. In many regards today is equivalent to in the hour of Caesar. So the standards of brain science are fixed and persevering. You will never need to unlearn what you found out about them.”

Mr Sarkozy, a previous Interior Minister took his intense person macho inside priest disposition into the Champs-Elysees in Paris. He lost the administration quite a while with his powerlessness to clarify his extreme severity measures to French individuals. Severity is vital for France, Greece and the remainder of Europe. Be that as it may, as a pioneer, you have to be able to interest the individuals intelligently just as inwardly.

The subsequent exercise was the job of far right pioneer Marine Le Pen in Mr Sarkozy’s annihilation. In promoting there is an idea called “Troublesome Innovation”. “Troublesome Innovation” is the little changes that permit an independent company to take on the 800lb gorillas. All Marine Le Pen did was change Mr Sarkozy’s message place her own turn on it and she had the option to disturb both Mr Sarkozy and Francois Hollande’s battle.

As business pioneers, we are on the whole advertisers. We have to take in the basic exercise from the misstep government officials make. The lawmaker has five years to confront his decision time, we as representatives with the interminable decision realized by the web, a solitary strike and we are out of our client’s kindness.

Subsequently, we can’t bear to rehash their slip-up. It doesn’t make a difference what your business is, regardless of whether you are selling item or administration, whether you are a legal counselor, bookkeeper, specialist, dental specialist or advisor, there is constantly a method for injecting feelings into your showcasing message.

You can’t have a go at speaking to individuals coherently; it would not be some time before you are in the courts declaring financial insolvency. You along these lines need to discover a method for interfacing individuals’ heart and head to your message.

Political Braying Doesn’t Sound Better In French

Nowadays it does not shock anyone when government officials and work pioneers swarm the receivers to decry an organization that plans to move lucrative occupations abroad.

In any case, right now, pundits didn’t let out the slightest peep about ensuring American laborers or about making American employments. It would have been odd on the off chance that they had, in light of the fact that the crowd was not a master American group. The “ocean” the occupations are moving over is the Atlantic Ocean, and their goal is Cambridge, Mass.

The fights were aimed at the French pharmaceutical monster Sanofi, one of the world’s greatest drugmakers. Amidst a not exactly excellent yet at the same time gainful year, the organization’s Canadian-German CEO, Christopher Viehbacher, reported designs to move many innovative work capacities from France to Massachusetts, home of Sanofi’s most up to date procurement, Genzyme. The move may wind up costing around 2,500 French occupations, as indicated by Jean-Francois Chavance, an agent of the French Democratic Confederation of Labor.

Viehbacher said that he trusted the move would help consolidate Genzyme’s way of life of advancement into Sanofi’s innovative work office. During a profit bring in July Viehbacher told journalists, “Out of our exploration in France, we haven’t generally built up another atom in 20 years.” (1) Genzyme, which Sanofi procured in a $20 billion antagonistic takeover, is a world head in delivering medications for uncommon hereditary illnesses.

French Industry Minister Arnaud Montebourg was not satisfied. In a discourse in the National Assembly, the pastor said he had revealed to Viehbacher that France “as of now experienced enough difficulty constraining hemorrhages at organizations that are losing cash,” without tolerating “that ultra-performing organizations begin annihilating occupations.” (2)

Obviously, it isn’t the duty of effective organizations to adjust work misfortunes at less fruitful firms. Truth be told, a major piece of what makes an organization fruitful is the capacity and eagerness to center occupations where the work should be possible the most adequately and at the least expense. Amazingly, Viehbacher reacted that Sanofi would “make no statements of regret for being a productive organization.” (2)

After Viehbacher’s refusal to reevaluate his business system exclusively to satisfy legislators, Montebourg and other French pioneers may feel that everything they can do is protest. Protesting is likely all that they will do, in spite of the troubling ramifications in a Wall Street Journal article (2) that the French government could fight back against Sanofi utilizing the influence of the national human services protection program.

There is another choice that French government authorities are ignoring: improve their nation’s business atmosphere so fruitful organizations have increasingly motivating force to wait.

Doing so would, as a matter of first importance, mean surrendering the informal approach of slamming organizations for choices that are useful for business however awful for government officials. Second, it would mean loosening up guidelines, so as to give organizations space to energize the kind of advancement that Sanofi has been not able to encourage in France, however that Genzyme had the option to create in the United States.

France right now positions 29th, among 183 economies, for by and large “simplicity of working together,” as per The World Bank’s Doing Business Project. The U.S. stays positioned at number four regardless of its own arrangement of issues, some of which I have expounded on previously, including those that drove the protection mammoth Aon to move its central station to the seventh-positioned United Kingdom. Since work costs are high in Western Europe, just as in the United States, an appealing administrative condition and an inventive culture are especially significant as methods for drawing the kind of more generously compensated employments Sanofi is moving to the U.S.

As opposed to attempting to pull in organizations, be that as it may, France is probably going to proceed with its procedure of attempting to constrain and terrify the ones previously based there into remaining. This is a similar talk we have heard here in the States. In contrast to numerous words, in any case, these don’t sound any better in French.